Thread: Turbulators?
View Single Post
Old 10-30-2011, 01:52 AM   #18 (permalink)
Ladogaboy
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
So a team of engineers with a windtunnel were able to eek out 1%......I rest my case. Thanks for helping me make my point.
Now you're just being combative, but if that's what makes you feel better about yourself.

Also, to be fair, the number is closer to 2% (~1.8%). Given that their main focus was not reducing drag, the fact that it has that effect regardless does have interesting implications. Especially for DIYers who have cars of similar designs. If people find this to be a simple way of stabilizing the rear of their cars at freeway speeds while also reducing drag (even if only by a small amount). I know that does not agree with your expert opinion on the matter, but most people value real-world results over expert opinions.

I can understand your obvious concern about companies that market these products of dubious value, but Mitsubishi did not design this as a separate product or gimmick. It was purpose-built and included with the vehicles for sale. They didn't make any extra money on it, and given the nature of the car, it was done as much if not more for performance than for aesthetics.
__________________
  Reply With Quote