View Single Post
Old 11-09-2011, 11:31 AM   #16 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodak View Post
Should? On what moral or economic grounds is this based upon?

A price is nothing more than a quantification of a product's value. And if the seller sets a ridiculous price, the consumer tries to leave. The seller wants it as high as consumers will tolerate, and consumers want it as low as possible. Really, a product's price is determined by what the market (the aggregate of the people) will tolerate.

Why artificially increase it?
Because the government has a vested interest in petrol sales (huuuuge money maker for them via taxes) and they are infatuated with the growth philosophy, they heavily manipulate fuel prices- perhaps not on the commodities trading floors or at the retailer level, but in vast subsidies for oil companies in the forms of favorable leases, tax deals, and of course military acquisition and protection of territories. Our "price" is not "true". Why artificially decrease it?
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 11-09-2011 at 11:52 AM..
  Reply With Quote