View Single Post
Old 12-16-2011, 06:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Diesel_Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
A car that measures fuel use by duty cycle might falsely report improved mileage with cleaner injectors.
I suppose that would be the case.

Personally I have a tough time believing anything fuel chemistry related will give you 5% better FE, aside from 5% more energy in the fuel. At least on common rail diesels. On the older pump-line-nozzle diesels, the fuel characteristics could actually change your injection timing. And your ignition delays were much longer then, so some cetane improvement could help you out. I don't think cetane matters nearly as much on common rails.

I could also see a cleaner giving you some improvement if your fuel system was dirty, but the claims are you'll get a 5% improvement regardless.

I'm thinking about taking them up on it. I need to run some cleaner anyway. If I don't get a 5% increase maybe I'll get my money back, therefore free cleaner
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote