View Single Post
Old 12-23-2011, 03:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Chains are efficient but to my thinking, no chain would be better yet! The GoldWing, for example, has a chain between the engine and trans, then there's the trans, then there's another chain leading to some gears that change the direction of power 90 degrees for the driveshaft, THEN there's the final drive gears which if hypoid really suck up power. And all those whirling shafts on bearings! Sheesh. But yeah you're right about the smallness of the bike trans; small gearsets should consume less power than big ones.
__________________


  Reply With Quote