View Single Post
Old 01-18-2012, 03:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
oil pan 4
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
For 1/4 miles time each pound of rotating mass you remove is said to be like removing up to 8 pounds of more static mass.

Since the EPA claims that every 100 pounds of weight reduction improves fuel economy by a few percent you would have to think that the same would be true for rotating mass. It would be very effective (1lb rotating = 8lb static) in stop and go driving but would act more like static weight reduction when the vehile speed remains static such as when traveling at highway speeds.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (01-18-2012), ECONORAM (01-03-2013), radioranger (01-04-2013)