View Single Post
Old 01-21-2012, 10:13 PM   #13 (permalink)
sendler
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
I guess I don't see how the extra weight is going to help. It's definitely going to increase the rolling resistance, and I don't see how it'll improve the P&G efficiency. Sure you can glide longer, but it'll take more energy to accelerate the additional mass. More energy out only because of more energy in.

You can still P&G going down a hill, just accelerate faster so the %load stays roughly the same.
The concept of adding mass to a competition vehicle is hard wrap your head around as a car driver but motorcycles have such a high power to weight ratio (even my 250) that to get even close to 80% throttle where peak ICE efficiency lies, the bike will be trying to rocket right out from under you up to a speed that is much higher than any average that you really want. Adding ballast would tame the violent swings of speed. This is why I would rather have a CBR125R for hypermiling to work on and for competition. It's peak efficiency power of 6-8 hp is closer to the demand that is needed for 50-65mph cruising. Less pulse and glide needed. The CBR250R is good at hypermiling but is also powerful enough to have passing power for out of town/ cross country trips.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
Diesel_Dave (01-22-2012), Sven7 (01-22-2012)