View Single Post
Old 01-22-2012, 10:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
user removed
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Adding weight is basically the same as making a bullet longer and heavier. It's called sectional density, more weight behind the same frontal area increases retained energy.
The bullet will retain a greater velocity at long ranges when it's sectional density is greater, even though it's initial velocity will be lower.

Either way you can rationally debate both scenarios. In the end it may actually be the configuration of the track and the elevations changes that determine your final decision. Longer glide periods that match the downhill portions of the track, while maintaining the required average speed may be your best bet.

Make the glide fit the track essentially, but I would still use some instrumentation to get the best data before you get on the track. Even a vacuum gauge so your acceleration is at the highest BSFC for the engine will help you P&G with consistency. Also you can mitigate the higher than desired engine power by simply using a higher gear for your pulse. 4th gear at 2 inches of vacuum will be better than 3rd at 5 inches, but you have to avoid too high a gear which will not be as efficient as the gear that gives best acceleration at the desired 90% load, with lowest RPM, on the engine.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote