View Single Post
Old 02-09-2012, 02:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
A/C efficiency penalty quantified

by our own National Renewable Energy Laboratory:

Quote:
Vehicle air conditioning (A/C) systems represent the major auxiliary load on the engines of light-duty passenger vehicles, sport-utility vehicles (SUV), and heavy-duty vehicles and have a dramatic effect on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions in conventional vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). Recent studies (paper is from about 2000?- Frank) have shown that, during the SC03 drive cycle, the average impact of the A/C system over a range of light-duty vehicles was to increase 1) fuel consumption by 28%, 2) carbon monoxide emissions by 71%, 3) nitrogen oxide emissions by 81%, and 4) non-methane hydrocarbons by 30%. Recent tests on hybrid electric vehicles (i.e., Toyota Prius / Honda Insight) at NREL [2] have shown that HEV fuel economy decreases by 30%-35% when the A/C operates.
And:
Quote:
About 7 billion gallons of fuel—about 5.5% of total national light-duty vehicle fuel use—are used annually just to cool light-duty vehicles in the United States.
Probably doesn't include all the time spent idling in parking lots to "keep it cool"

I ripped the compressor and condenser outta the Coupe a few days ago...

__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 02-09-2012 at 03:18 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cd (02-09-2012), Ryland (02-09-2012), slowmover (02-09-2012)