View Single Post
Old 02-09-2012, 07:01 PM   #16 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt View Post
Let's just say he has aweful attachment on the top of his vehicle, and has to raise the roof 9" to get attached flow. Let's say the length of the roof is 9'. Total additional cross wind area is going to be on the order of 3.25 square feet. This is much less than the area that is added by raising the roof on a van (which is common, and those don't tip over in cross winds), and the edges running back will no doubt be rounded over for sideways attached flow thus mitigating much of the poor handling you are hinting at.
I added a 4' long SedanKamm partial boat tail to my little car and drove it that way for over 3 months. I experienced 60mph crosswinds and saw no ill effects. Jim has added a boat tail to his Insight and driven in 60mph crosswinds with no ill effects (actually improved his cross wind handling). How big is Aerohead's bed cover when viewed from the side? I contend, it is not an issue that makes it not worth pursuing.
If the roof is 5w x 9l and the peak of the addition is 9", it could have 3.75 sq ft frontal area and just about anything for side area depending on the ascending and descending geometry... likely guess puts side area at about the same as frontal.

I did not even so much as hint about handling. I was talking about the simple addition of more "frontal" area in yaw, and unlike off the back, we don't have the opportunity to boattail that.
__________________


  Reply With Quote