Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
The key word there, though, is "honest". How much of the disagreement on climate science - or evolution, vaccination, nuclear power, etc - is actually honest? That is, how many of the people disagreeing have made the slightest attempt to actually understand the science, instead of (at best) doing a cursory scan to look for a few words they can twist into loopholes for what they believe?
|
With the exception of Nuclear Power (I still think it has a purpose but needs control) I think we can agree - to disagree that is, in a respectful way ? I hope we can anyway.