View Single Post
Old 02-18-2012, 07:50 PM   #116 (permalink)
Olympiadis
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
True skepticism is a good thing. The problem here is that the climate "skeptics" want us to go on believing that the world is flat, and ignoring all that pesky science that says it's round.
Link to proof of this claim about climate skeptics ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Only if you a) don't have a clue about the science involved; and b) refuse to learn. We might, by exactly the same logic, claim that because the roll of any one die is very difficult to predict, the house doesn't have the edge in craps, yet somehow casinos still make a profit :-)
Actually the logic of the fact that any roll of die is unpredictable is exactly why the casino makes the profit. It does not suggest that the casino somehow has a superior ability to predict the outcome. It's just that the casino is betting against your ability to predict successfully.

The "warmers" have used this same sort of reasoning to the effect that if they cannot scientifically prove what is causing the warming, then skeptics are unable to disprove their claims. This is not science folks.
  Reply With Quote