View Single Post
Old 02-29-2012, 06:47 PM   #68 (permalink)
PaleMelanesian
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Precisely, but if you design the vehicle so it accomplishes the same as an individual effort without any specific driver input, then you have changed the way fuel is consumed on a planetary scale.

Which is more effective, one hypermiler driving a car to maximise it's efficiency or a billion vehicles all over the Earth driving themselves in a way that optimizes the efficiency of every drop of fuel they consume.

Hopefully food for thought, not meant as any point of contention.

regards
Mech
You're absolutely right. That's why I'm so excited about the GM 1.4 turbo Cruze and Ford's Ecoboost series. A smaller engine moves cruising load higher up the chart, making it more efficient. A turbo (or hybrid-type electric boost) makes up the lost power, but only when needed.

I just choose to make a difference in my own consumption right now, and not wait for "them" to do it for me. After buying a scangauge, the driving techniques are free.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote