View Single Post
Old 02-29-2012, 08:43 PM   #70 (permalink)
drmiller100
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Y

drmiller, let's do a real world data comparison. I've seen 60% claimed fuel consumption decrease from variable intake duration systems...I think that matches the <1hp estimate pretty well.
60 percent seems rather high.

do you mean 6 percent?????

variable cam is a different effect. the two should be additive.
  Reply With Quote