View Single Post
Old 03-04-2012, 02:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,815

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky View Post
That 30% efficiency includes drvetrain losses, road friction losses, losses due to heat, losses due to accessories, etcetera.

The engine itself is nearly 100% efficient at converting fuel into power (except the fuel that is used to cool the engine and light the cats). But only 30% of that power goes towards pushing the car around. If you increase the efficiency of the engine itself by one percent and ignore all the loses caused by other stuff, then you're only going to gain a fraction of percent gain in efficiency overall.
Not so. ICE engines are extremely inefficient at converting energy into work and the efficiency ratings do not include drivetrain losses or any other losses external to the engine itself.

As the math shows, a 1 point increase in efficiency on a 30% efficient engine is a 3% increase in overall efficiency.

Most Efficient Diesel Engine - 50% Efficient
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote