View Single Post
Old 03-06-2012, 06:20 PM   #27 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Since you are looking to build a from scratch chassis, why not go for all the efficiency you can? Aero drag is a huge contributor to energy loss, and it is a total loss, always.
I didn't mean this so much to be a "design" as a "concept" intended to express the idea of combining "two parts".

It is a format to learn by, explore and maybe a leaping point. I have much prettier cars, this is just a test mule.

One test is the rear, and to see if what I did works and why. If it works (wing aside), can it, should it be done to other cars with benefit?

Examples below of applying this principal to other cars. The goal is not to make them prettier, but to aid in lowering drag. I know they have "stuff" back there (like an engine), just taking "form" here. Is this form, serving a function?

Automobile 2 - Odds and Ends pictures by kach22i - Photobucket

Automobile 2 - Odds and Ends pictures by kach22i - Photobucket


Industrial Design - Transportation pictures by kach22i - Photobucket


Couple More.........
http://s184.photobucket.com/albums/x...%20and%20Ends/

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 03-06-2012 at 06:57 PM..
  Reply With Quote