View Single Post
Old 04-01-2012, 02:49 AM   #29 (permalink)
Mulder25
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 25

F.O.R.D - '87 Dodge Dakota LE

Failure - '01 Toyota Corolla CE

Aveo - '07 Chevrolet Aveo LS
90 day: 36.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...has nothing to do with their realtime displays, as both are easy to see and understand; however, it's almost impossible to capture & record data from an analog vacuum gauge, but very easy to do so from a digital system.

...and many MPG people like to track/analyze what happens as they strive from better FE.
I think we are arguing about something ridiculous, they have both available for different reasons, i personally prefer the analog. You can attach a recording device to the OBDII to get your recording, if you choose to use an analog display, or you can get a digital one.
I find analogs to be more reliable, faster, and easier to read, but this is my opinion, and I respect yours.
Nevertheless, a vacuum gauge can, and does provide information that can be used for hypermiling, and if you are on a budget, it is a very cheap implementation.
  Reply With Quote