View Single Post
Old 04-06-2012, 11:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
drmiller100
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
I have given a LOT of thought about this lately.

I don't think it is a simple solution.

The high pressure at the front of the car doesn't really cost energy in the long run. What costs energy is the turbulence or size of the rear of the car.

So, the channel has to be BIG to be effective. and if the channel can be big, why not just make the frontal area smaller?

I think there are easier, simpler benefits with just rearrange the tail - make it taper. You get most of the benefits with almost none of the hassle.

However, I really invite discussion - I think this is MOST of the mileage gains to be found.
  Reply With Quote