View Single Post
Old 04-07-2012, 07:14 PM   #25 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete
The unused cylinders will have reduced wear. I wonder if it would be worth the added expense of making all 4 cylinders deactivatable?
All the pistons are still going up and down- that's a good deal of it right there. Today's engines have better cylinder materials than the play-doh that's been used in the past. I've seen cylinders in a Ford 3.0 with 150,000 miles on 'em that looked like the day they left the factory- no ridge, vivid crosshatching, etc. Contrast that with the cylinders of a small block Chevy from anytime pre-'80s or '90s- 100,000 miles on 'em and they probably need to be bored .030 to clean 'em up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel View Post
I'm curious though, wouldn't vacuum pull valves open a bit even if the cam wasn't pushing them? Especially with the help of manifold pressure on the other side of the exhaust valves..
Ever tried to compress a valve spring?
__________________


  Reply With Quote