View Single Post
Old 04-12-2012, 03:27 AM   #12 (permalink)
Sven7
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
If I'm interpreting Aerohead's stuff right, you could see a 20% fuel economy increase with a well-made Kammback.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ial-12986.html

Based on the fact that the rear of your cabin hits near 20% of the template, and the end of the kammback will hit about 40%.

Quote:
zero------ Cd 0.488
10 %----- Cd 0.375
20 %----- Cd 0.299
30 %----- Cd 0.240
40 %----- Cd 0.194
50 %----- Cd 0.162
60 %----- Cd 0.135
70 %----- Cd 0.125
80 %----- Cd 0.118
90 %----- Cd 0.118
100 %---- Cd 0.115
.299/.194=~1.54, or 54% drag reduction... right? Half that for fuel economy increase. Phil let me know if I'm doing this wrong

Even if that equation is backward you should still see 4mpg. Start to drive more economically and you could see 30mpg tanks. After all 20mpg on an auto trans is not the best starting point

Last (I promise haha), you might consider doing a build thread for the car to consolidate all this info and the grille block stuff, etc. into one place.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 04-12-2012 at 03:33 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-12-2012)