View Single Post
Old 04-14-2012, 08:08 AM   #91 (permalink)
Blu3Z3rg
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The reason, whether it's right or not, would be that the exhaust gasses get burnt a second time in the cat and therefore should take up less volume. Do a cat back and you'll see some power and mpg increase.
If you do a catback with 2" all the way through, maybe with a straight through muffler of some sort (flowing proper cfm isn't the only thing, a smooth flow is necessary) then you will see your best gains for the money.


Remember, exhaust works with FLUID dynamics. Meaning, think of water flowing through it - is it smooth, or will the water get chopped up and sloshed around?

__________________
  Reply With Quote