View Single Post
Old 04-19-2012, 09:46 AM   #18 (permalink)
sendler
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Interference valve trains are better. That is why they are used. The ideal piston would be a flat top for the minimum surface area to pick up wasted heat. Squish zones and swirl patterns then deviate from that. Putting cut outs into the piston top makes it heavier, turbulent, fuel sticks to the cut outs, increases counterproductive surface area, ect. Big vaves make more power but also increase interference. Non interference engines are a trade off to be fail safe but are not technically as good.
  Reply With Quote