Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i
I think Joe's wife will still call it a "bike" and will go crying home to her mother's.
However, bang for the buck this type of layout will get you the most performance value - in my opinion.
Nice work, thanks for sharing the details of how it was illustrated.
Did anyone in your class try Autodesk Revit software? It seems to be replacing AutoCad in architecture, or at least on job postings.
.................................................. ...edit
How is the rear wheel held on and driven?
Are the front wheels essentially on a solid axle?
Do you have some of your classmates work for this project posted on your Flick-R account?
|
Three wheelers can't really go down on some gravel and are much better in braking as well. So control wise, it's better. But as far as being thrown off the cycle it's just as bad as most bikes. I imagine his wife would be- well let's call it "less mad"- about the purchase.
We don't to architecture or engineering so we don't use Revit or 3DSMax or Rhino. We use Alias because it's good with making fancy surfaces (even if we aren't
)
I will be posting photos of the presentations in the future. Kind of burnt out from being on the computer for half a week straight. (Seriously)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn
I have always thought that can am really should have lowered the seating about a foot or more.
|
We discussed this and one student (Ronald Jacobs) created a low-seating concept. Ultimately Can-Am is going for a "ride-on" experience like a motorcycle rather than a "ride in" feeling like a car or go-kart.