View Single Post
Old 05-10-2012, 06:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
tortoise
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp944 View Post
-Should I go with a 5.3, 5.7, or 6.0L engine?
4.8
Quote:
-Does one want to shorten the stroke or lengthen it?
For a given displacement, a longer bore gives a more compact cumbustion chamber, which you want for thermal efficiency.

If you can make it work, GM Active Fuel Management (google it), aka displacement on demand, would be helpful.

You'll want a monster, granny gear, which will be completely unused in track work.

As others are pointing out, you want low volume ports and a low duration and overlap cam, which are, of course, not the way high output engines are normally set up.

An interesting, challenging, project.

Last edited by tortoise; 05-10-2012 at 06:58 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tortoise For This Useful Post:
bp944 (05-14-2012)