View Single Post
Old 05-11-2012, 09:46 AM   #364 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If they intend to drive these 'supercars' as one might the Bugatti Veyron then I suppose that induced drag will be a mandatory component of the design,and preclude any significant body plan taper necessary for meaningful drag reduction.
Using the Bugatti Veyron drag (and down-force) as an example.............
the Bugatti Page: Bugatti Veyron driving experience
Quote:
But 230 mph is about as fast as the Veyron will go until you put the car into top-speed mode. This involves coming to a stop and, while the car is idling, turning a key in a lock on the floor to the left of the driver's seat. When you do that, the car sinks down even lower on its suspension, until ground clearance has been reduced to a mere 2.6 inches in front and 2.8 in the rear. This setup also causes the front underbody flaps to close and the rear spoiler and wing to retract, although the wing remains tilted out of the body at a slight two-degree angle. These changes reduce the car's drag coefficient from 0.41 to 0.36, and they reduce the peak downforce from 770 to 120 pounds..
Some Cd listings posted.
Automobile drag coefficient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

..............the same Cd as...........
Quote:
0.36 Honda Civic 2001–2005
Just trying to put it all in perspective.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-11-2012), wyatt (09-06-2012)