View Single Post
Old 05-11-2012, 01:49 PM   #49 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Ran across an interesting (to me, anyway) article re the finiteness of Earth: http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/...ets-physicist/

Quote:
Physicist: Before we tackle that, we’re too close to an astounding point for me to leave it unspoken. At that 2.3% growth rate, we would be using energy at a rate corresponding to the total solar input striking Earth in a little over 400 years. We would consume something comparable to the entire sun in 1400 years from now. By 2500 years, we would use energy at the rate of the entire Milky Way galaxy—100 billion stars! I think you can see the absurdity of continued energy growth. 2500 years is not that long, from a historical perspective. We know what we were doing 2500 years ago. I think I know what we’re not going to be doing 2500 years hence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
cfg83 (05-11-2012), Frank Lee (06-08-2012), Piwoslaw (05-12-2012)