View Single Post
Old 05-28-2012, 12:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
t vago
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 830
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwebb View Post
10% improvement .... not very likely
I did a little Excel heat energy calculation, using a specific heat of 1 kJ/(kg K) for air, and 2 kJ/(kg K) for gasoline. The air was assumed to be at 30 C (86 F), and the gasoline was assumed to be heated up to 90 C (194 F, and presumably heated up by engine coolant). A 14.7:1 mass ratio was assumed, too.

(1 kJ/(kg K)) * (14.7 parts air) * (30 C + 273.15 C) + (2 kJ/(kg K)) * (1 part gasoline) * (90 C + 273.15 C) =

(1 kJ/(kg K)) * (14.7 parts air) * (303.15 K) + (2 kJ/(kg K)) * (1 part gasoline) * (363.15 K) =

4456.305 kJ/kg + 726.3 kJ/kg =

5182.605 kJ/kg

Now, to find the final temperature of this mixture:

5182.605 kJ/kg / (1 kJ/(kg K)) * (14.7 parts air) + (2 kJ/(kg K)) * (1 part gasoline)) =

5182.605 kJ/kg / (16.7 kJ/(kg K)) =

310.3 K

or

37.2 C (98.9 F). This is a 12.9 F difference between the initial and final temperatures.

Given that my documented HAI gain of around 5% is done with an intake air difference of about 45 F, I would have to agree that 10% improvement with fuel heating seems rather unlikely.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
brent777 (05-29-2012), mechman600 (05-28-2012)