View Single Post
Old 06-13-2012, 11:45 PM   #12 (permalink)
meanjoe75fan
eco-scrapper
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Kensington PA
Posts: 69

Big Blue - '94 Ford F-150 shortbed
90 day: 15.71 mpg (US)

Mexico Nuevo - '84 Honda V45 Sabre
90 day: 36.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
One thing to keep in mind: a turbo can be designed for performance, or for fuel economy. Although a turbo CAN up FE, sports-tuned turbo setups frequently do worse than NA engines of the same HP rating.

Most of it comes down to turbine sizing. Suppose you need more top-gear HP at freeway speeds: you shoild size the turbine such that full boost comes at.WOT and freeway RPM without opening the wastegate.

)The downside is that this would use a "huge" turbine that added little power down low, and was laggy as hell, due to the massive turbine inertia.

Typically, turbo engines modified for aviation use (steady-state power) will use a 7L turbine for somethi.g like a 2L subaru.

Cases in,point: my stepdad owned a mid-80s Saab 9000 turbo. It was known for high mpg-but was very laggy. The 2002 WRX I owned had lots of power, virtually no lag-and got 17 Mp
__________________
  Reply With Quote