View Single Post
Old 06-17-2012, 11:07 AM   #3 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I've seen that recently... don't recall if it was linked from here or I just found it surfing. Anyway, I agree with parts of it. Just imagine every vehicle on Earth carting around an extra Ton or so of needless bulk, as they are now. Yeah, that's a good chunk of energy and materials waste.

Also, I think speeds are higher than need be. My somewhat arbitrary thought is, trips under 50 miles are not penalized very much time-wise by speeds under or even well under 55 mph. I do think 20 mph is too slow for much of anything going out of town though. I take my electric bicycle on 17 mile round trips at about 20 mph and sometimes wish for a little more speed, which I could have were I not using a lower power setting to save on the batteries.

Quote:
Contrary to vehicles with an internal combustion engine, electric cars are more fuel efficient in cities than at steady speed on a highway - an electric motor uses no energy when it is idling, and regenerative braking works best in city traffic.
It has been my experience that in-town starting and stopping wears the batteries down far, far faster on my electric bike than steady-state cruising down the road.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-17-2012 at 11:42 AM..
  Reply With Quote