[slowmover]

Nice idea, DD. Punching the "Thanks" button is one level, but a gushing PM seems too much other times. I look forward to using this thread to exploring other lines of interest as folks offer up directions to their inspirations.

I tend to think of threads/ideas I follow as they mirror my own interests more than contributors. But one cannot do so in actuality. The folks below also tend to post quite a bit, and, with threads of their own also shape interest in the forum as a whole. By extension, if/when the Internet goes down here's the reason I'd miss you guys (all who participate herein!)

So, to the idiosyncratic: IC vehicles -- for me -- have a whole other dimension in how much one could earn with them and as being central to a nomadic life in the strange new world we inhabit which is a set of a subset of interest around here. Fulltiming is not just for retired RV'ers as "owning" one house after another across the US in the search for opportunity is a time that has passed. Blessed are those who have found that place for the future.

I'll add to the above list with those currently contributing (no order offered or implied):


aerohead

- when one ought to start from scratch The Aerodynamic Template is the source beginning, the door to reading (Hucho, et.al). Dad's daddy. This place is to me unimaginable without him. A man with library references is gold.


KamperBob

- Clarification from experience . . . and those long, slow thoughts which shed the extraneous in the smart use of machinery in moving around the country. On a sabbatical which will yield benefits to the rest of us (Recreation Engineer a well-chosen moniker) as knowing how to think about something is a trump.


skyking

- I'm hopeful the aero RV of tow vehicle & trailer can see light of day. Proof-of-concept is how it feels from this distance; it's one big undertaking. And by a man with more than just admirable fabrication skills. The truck belly pan is bookmarked for the day I can find the time, place and patience to try it. I'd not ever hesitate to ask his advice, either.


Bondo

- I'd have never guessed that such a simple device (the Aerolid; and only in appearance) could make such a significant difference in fuel burn. Longevity, too, if one believes that reduction of horsepower demand equates to an increase in vehicle longevity. I hope it is perceived as a compliment that the name has already achieved the same place as xerox, kleenex, etc in description (if only around here . . for now). My hopes for production in the nearest future.


BamZipPow

Coroplast was a material to which I'd never given a second thought . . until now. Glad someone can take the long hours of driving to improve the breed by thinking/experimenting. (And my hope that the income derived is commensurate in some manner with the distances and times). This is the (lower cased) middle way: continual improvement with such small budgetary constraints in experimentation as to be meaningless. Ha, signboard . . . .


DieselDave

- have made my encomium in another thread. Stretched me to make yet another level of discipline in mpg . . successfully. Achieved FE numbers on his CTD that should have been hidden behind a paywall.


orbywan

- a bar none favorite for the quality of the work and the unexpectedly high level of success on a vehicle few to none would consider worth the trouble. But, for a family traveling some real distances, his Class C motorhome would make one fine vehicle central to moves across and around the country. And such a vehicle is big enough to easily carry bicycles or mopeds for local transportation. That big box can provide the services of water handling, propane for cooking/heating, electrical via solar and generator for a group for a month or more (water capacity is the only real limitation). A "hidden" gem in that manner.

BigDave

- IMO, broke some ground in establishing an FE subforum on a pickup board in re fuel economy based on experience, a ground-upwards view, and simple enough rules (aero & gearing) to help others otherwise unwilling to buy a gazillion dollars of aftermarket magic boxes, etc. Real results from the diesel pickup unicorn wrangler.


Frank Lee

- just when you think you've pegged him, he surprises again. How much less fun this forum might be without him . . the gadfly "persona" was an inspired choice. Can scrounge, adapt, read . . all with consistent discipline and depth (can shed preconceptions). Can also spot a suckers bet from a mile away.


Old Mechanic

- able to place most any technical aspect or usage of vehicles (in part or whole) in a historical context. What they are (cars) is one thing, but how they are used is much more insightful in re potential changes to their design/construction. Great insights, period. Glad he "enjoys" the give and take . . seems many of his ilk wander away from boards once the less insightful show up and clutter up the conversations. Many boards simply wither and zombifie after "original" contributors move on to other venues.


There are others whom I do not read enough (JethroBodine, Piwoslaw, euromodder, etc, who obviously have quite a good handle on the meet of theory and practice). And yet others who range widely where fuel economy is part of a much larger societal (and planetary) puzzle (such as NeilBlanchard).

Don't shoot me for missing obvious important contributors, I know I haven't come close to what the board represents . . only in starting from my peculiar interests do I circle around again and again to the above, by direction and sometimes by chance.

I look forward to what others post herein. One can wander the woods in a circle (our strides pull us left or right making this a constant), or one can use the maps on offer.

May this thread be a map.

.