View Single Post
Old 07-26-2012, 01:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
redyaris
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744

redyaris - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.54 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 Suzuki GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

streamliner1 - '83 Honda VT500 streamliner
Motorcycle
90 day: 75.63 mpg (US)

White Whale - '12 Sprinter 2500 Cargo Van
90 day: 22.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
I have chosen to lower the seat height to what can be accumplished without cutting the frame, this is about 2" - 3" which will give me a seat height of 29" +/-. I will be leanig forward, but some what less than stock, because of the lower seat height. I will not add any rear fine area as that will cause unnessisary affects from cross winds in normal raod riding, in fact I will be trying to reduce the rear side area to that which will accomidate 4 bags of groceries. the top of the behinde the rider cargo space will be a semi-circle; again to reduce side wind affects [at Bonneville if there is more than a 3 mph cross wind the runs are postponed, not so on the road...]. Much of this is from what I have learned from my VT500 project over 3000 miles. I will be using the same basic design as the VT500; which is aluminium skin over aluminium bulk heads. Much more care will be directed toward internal air duckting than with the VT500. On the CBR 600 the radiator is high and wide which will make ducting easier, and the front fender does a much better job of streamling the front wheel/forks. The transvers inline engine layout make cooling easier than with a V-twin Layout.

Last edited by redyaris; 07-26-2012 at 01:36 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redyaris For This Useful Post:
Grant-53 (07-26-2012)