View Single Post
Old 08-14-2012, 12:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Right, it is a matter of the RPM vs the flame spread rate -- higher RPM requires an undersquare design (shorter stroke than piston diameter), but this is limited by the flame spread over a larger area that is also very thin. A lower RPM can work well with an oversquare design (longer stroke than piston diameter) since there is a longer period of time for the flame to spread and the piston is smaller, too.

So all else being equal, I would think that an oversquare design burns the fuel more completely.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote