View Single Post
Old 08-14-2012, 07:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
some_other_dave
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by meanjoe75fan View Post
Well, yeah...circa 2012 tech will do better than circa 1998 tech.
OK, a 1998 Civic will get much better than 35 MPG at 55 MPH.

My 1990 CRX averaged 46 MPG over several years, with at least a couple of 50 MPG tanks in there. At 55 MPH, I'm pretty sure it was well over 50 MPG. Mine wasn't even the high-MPG HF version, which the EPA rated at 50 MPG with stops and starts and accelerations and decelerations.

35 MPG instantaneous at 55 MPH is really fairly crappy. Heck, a late-90s Vette gets close to that, and might even do better!

I'm pretty sure the Focus isn't a very aero car--the lousy MPG (if it really is 35) proves that point.

-soD
  Reply With Quote