View Single Post
Old 08-15-2012, 10:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It isn't rpm so much as it is piston speed. Too low a piston speed and efficiency drops because there's too much time for the heat of combustion to escape through the combustion chamber into the coolant. Too fast a piston speed and efficiency drops from increased internal engine friction.

Those super low rpm engines also have long strokes... figure out the piston speed and you will find it to be similar across many engine sizes and types.

Gasoline 4-strokers like 1000-1200 ft/mn. IIRC diesel 2-strokers like 1600 ft/mn.

I have postulated that a heavier flywheel would help me when short-shifting though.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
stillsearching (08-17-2012)