View Single Post
Old 08-18-2012, 10:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
tim3058
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Vortec heads are awesome, I totally agree with drmiller100. I did a a lot of forum reading/research last year when I was building up a 350 V8 for the Z28 - Vortec is hands down best bang for the buck horsepower-wise. The vortecs were designed to flow a lot more (in low-lift conditions, where the valve spends the majority of its duration) than prior heads, and a revamped combustion chamber allowed a faster burn of the mix. This allows us to run less ignition advance and still get the complete burn. Less ignition advance means less time where the combustion has already started while piston is still traveling up to top-dead-center (TDC). Any combustion prior to TDC serves to slow the piston down, decreasing efficiency. More flow, less advance needed, both seem to be a win for mpgs.
__________________


  Reply With Quote