View Single Post
Old 08-22-2012, 08:50 AM   #8 (permalink)
KamperBob
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 521

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 311
Thanked 136 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000neon View Post
I am really considering a much more dramatic, full kammback for my Neon. Allowing the sides to taper in as much as possible without interfering with opening the trunk. Also, I am considering making a hinge system on the top, to allow me to fold it back and use the trunk. My issue is with building rounded corners on the top-to-side transition.

I know that rounded corners are preferred aerodynamically speaking, ease of construction is another story. To the best of my understanding, this is because with just a straight, creased edge, the airflow "trips" over the edge, causing vortices which will increase drag and severely limit the drag reduction potential, am I correct?

So how drastic of a rounded corner does it need to be? I assume the more rounded the better, but is there a known minimum amount of curve that is required?

Finally, I know people can compare the amount of roundness by talking about the size of it, for example a 3/4" radius. So does that mean that if the curve was a whole circle, it would be 1.5" in diameter? Is that sufficient for avoiding air tripping over the edge? I am just trying to get my head around what kind of curve I need, to figure out the best way to build it.

Thanks for any input, you guys have already helped me out so much in building my Neon to where it is, and I appreciate it. This site is great!
Edge radii solve a problem. Ideally (perfect design) flow wouldn't need to mix between top and sides. In practice cross winds mean up/down wash can't be avoided. From Hucho





Using a nominal 6' body %5 would be 3.6" radius.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Fig. 1.52.JPG
Views:	390
Size:	115.2 KB
ID:	11354   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fig. 1.53.JPG
Views:	376
Size:	131.5 KB
ID:	11355  
__________________
Recreation Engineer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KamperBob For This Useful Post:
COcyclist (08-22-2012)