View Single Post
Old 08-23-2012, 06:01 PM   #18 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmodem View Post
I used to think like you. I had a pair of nearly worn front tires that were >2/32nds. I couldn't see the top Lincoln's head when I placed the penny in the groove. Probably good for another couple thousand miles I figure. Then one night, it started raining as I drove home and I hydroplaned into the median. I paid the deductible to fix my car and then drove straight to the tire place to replace the not completely bald tires. My insurance went up but since my car was approaching self-insure-worth, I decided to drop down to liability only coverage. Wow, was that an expensive mistake.

You could argue I was just careless that night. I could also argue that if I had meatier tires, I would have cleared the water better and gripped the road better.
There's another good reason to put the best tires on the front.
__________________


  Reply With Quote