Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyL
Dunno about a gantry tow, but the water tunnel is feasible, but my Google foo is lacking - is there some papers around on design principles?
|
All the serious scientific work is done in a tank,with the gantry riding rails on either side moving the model through the water.
The U.S.NAVY's David Taylor Model Basin is probably the most famous.
Texas Tech constructed a smaller tank setup to test a 1/3-scale ( I think) Ford Taurus model with complete engine compartment and clear hood to photograph under hood cooling flow.That model cost $63,000.
Somewhere I have a SAE Paper of tests on 1/24-scale F-1 or Indycar models that were pulled underwater.I'll see if I can find it.
Texas Tech has a water tunnel in which dye (red food coloring) is released from ports drilled in the models body,which can be observed through the glass test section.No force measurements can be obtained.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did find GM's Paper.
It's from SAE Transactions,Volume 70,1962.The research was conducted at Cal Tech,in the Guggenheim Aeronautical Laboratory by Harold Flynn and Peter Kyropoulos,using 1/8-scale models.
The model was @ 4% test section blockage ratio,Rn=17,000,000,@ 160 mph wind velocity,with a 600-hp blower.
There is a pictorial representation of their data which I put together over at the trailer thread.
Their work seems to verify the 'Denominator-Rule' if you will,where in order to achieve proper boundary layer verisimilitude,you merely multiply 20-mph times the denominator of the fraction which defines the model scale.
i.e.GM's 1/8-scale = 8X20= 160 mph.