View Single Post
Old 08-28-2012, 12:06 AM   #26 (permalink)
meanjoe75fan
eco-scrapper
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Kensington PA
Posts: 69

Big Blue - '94 Ford F-150 shortbed
90 day: 15.71 mpg (US)

Mexico Nuevo - '84 Honda V45 Sabre
90 day: 36.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
For a turbo that does better, fe-wise, than the N/A version: the '88 Saab 9000 turbo matches it's N/A version EPA combined, and betters it by 2MPG on the highway. Same car, same engine....one had a turbo bolted; one didn't.

It was also extremely laggy, which shows the path to success: a really big, heavy turbine wheel.

Diesel dave: you mentioned compressor/turbine combos at 50% efficiency...better tgan piston power. Then wny not delete the piston portion and go with a pure turbine engine? I was told in my flying days that a piston would handily beat a turbine in "power-specific fuel consumption": is that no longer true?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to meanjoe75fan For This Useful Post:
stillsearching (08-31-2012)