View Single Post
Old 10-02-2012, 07:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,360
Thanks: 24,460
Thanked 7,399 Times in 4,793 Posts
Ranger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saskwatchian View Post
Well 4x4 Rangers with the SOHC 4.0L V6 get notoriously poor fuel economy even with standard sized tires. The fact that a smaller truck burnt more fuel than a full sized F150 was one of Fords excuses for discontinuing them in NA. He is on-par with the EPA combined number despite the big meats.


Come on, give me at least 2.5/4
I visited with a guy with a 2WD Ranger in Dona Ana,New Mexico.He was reporting 28 MPG HWY actual.He'd worn out an Isuzu pickup which he said was good for 29 MPG.
Looks like there is fruit to pluck!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote