View Single Post
Old 10-11-2012, 07:55 PM   #28 (permalink)
christofoo
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
Okay, hopefully without talking too much...

If you have a belly pan under there and cover up the hole you won't have vortexes anyway. So, just throw some coroplast on there and don't worry about a radius. Flow attachment usually is a problem on the rear, but with a slope like that on the front everything that goes under the air dam will be completely detached. There's nothing for the flow to "ride" on.

With ducting you should be fine. The Probe is fine even without ducting. If you're not aware, P&G and EOC keep engine temps down pretty well also. Mutual benefit.
My uncertainty on that design wasn't cooling effectiveness, but rather on the drag experienced by the air traveling through the scoop. After all, the advantage is that taking air from that location will reduce the drag elsewhere. But it may not be a net benefit if the scoop itself is lossy.

I know it would be better with a belly pan... and a boattail...

(BTW, the inlet is supposed to be designed for climbing 5% 2000ft mountain passes, one of the things it will be doing tomorrow. I can always block or partially block the inlet for less demanding applications.)
  Reply With Quote