Thread: Vacuum HP
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2012, 04:06 PM   #13 (permalink)
serialk11r
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
You need to take into account the energy regained on the compression stroke, even if we assume constant pressure and all to make things simpler.

2042rpm is 2042/60=34.03 revolutions per second. The engine draws in half its rated displacement per revolution, so this is 1.905L * 17.01 (let's just drop the thousandths) = 32.3L/second.

The intake stroke consumes 32.3L*42.8kPa=1382 J per second, or 1.85hp. I don't know where your 36hp is coming from.

To sweeten the deal, the compression stroke now regains some of that power, probably around 40% of it. So the total loss is about 1hp. Seems about right for a 1.9L engine that runs at those speeds.

BMW only saw 10% improvement in fuel economy on naturally aspirated engines with Valvetronic, the throttle is not as evil as some people make it out to be.
  Reply With Quote