View Single Post
Old 06-11-2008, 07:32 AM   #112 (permalink)
tasdrouille
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
I'm afraid you are mistaken in this. I think the source of the misunderstanding is that you are trying to look at too big a picture.

If you imagine a tire with a given load on it - and you can change the tire, but you can't change the load carrying capacity - then narrow treaded tires work better - less volume of rubber moving = less hysteresis.

BTW, the graph posted earlier is RRC (Rolling Resistance Coefficient) and not RR (Rolling Resistance) - and that might be part of the confusion.
That aint quite so.

RR = RRC * load

You've got a car applying a load X.
You have P215/70R15 with a RRC of roughly 0.0099.
You have P195/65R15 with a RRC of roughly 0.0113.
Both tires can handle load X.

Which tire has the lowest RR?

EDIT:
Quote:
And since we know that rated load plays a HUGE role in RR
Where exactly do you see rated load in the RR equation? It's the actual load, we usually never reach the rated loads.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...

Last edited by tasdrouille; 06-11-2008 at 10:38 AM..
  Reply With Quote