View Single Post
Old 11-07-2012, 11:29 PM   #144 (permalink)
superchow
Master of 140 hamsters
 
superchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 183

Hamster - '07 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 29.41 mpg (US)

Whooshy Wagon - '04 Volvo V40
90 day: 23.33 mpg (US)

Minotaur - '09 Ford Taurus X SEL
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
That's the Subaru Tribeca (see Subaru Tribeca - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), which I agree is the ugliest looking (modern) Subaru there is... I was really disappointed when that one came out since I'm a Subaru fan...

Seems like a lot of people are calling some of the cars ugly because their functionality (or lack thereof)... That's one thing that doesn't compute for me... seems like a car can be good looking without having any functional benefits while a car with excellent functional benefits can be quite ugly looking...
Funny thing I noticed about Subarus:

They exist outside the normal car design universe! They release a model and people go: "Ew". Ten years later they look acceptable, almost like they have design that doesn't age. Look at a 1998 Forester - it still has the rugged accents and cutesy styling and foremost the underlying capability that people liked about them. It's weird. They age well.

Now, if I look at a set of chrome 20" wheels on a Chrysler 300... not so nice in 2 years.
__________________
  Reply With Quote