View Single Post
Old 11-13-2012, 03:25 AM   #23 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
By not paying the true cost for fossil fuel because of extensive subsidy, the hogs ARE insulated.
Agreed. Subsidies should almost without exception be eliminated. We should be paying the true cost of fossil fuels as well as the true cost of ethanol.

That said, subsidies don't relate to the topic of mandating a lower speed limit. Perhaps when cars are automated and drive themselves that would make a more compelling argument for a lower national speed limit.

Most people do not consider the majority of driving they do to be entertaining or productive (outside of the need to get from point A to point B). That means that arriving at a destination more quickly increases productivity or free time. The value of productivity and free time should not be underestimated.

Considering the exceedingly short duration of a lifetime, it is wise to consider ways to reduce the 4.22 years the average person spends in a vehicle.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote