View Single Post
Old 11-21-2012, 07:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wungun View Post
High load I can understand...
But high rpm isn't that efficient because of the frictional and pumping losses...
It is that efficient, the map shows the efficiency through the whole rpm band. It shows the efficiency drop due to frictional losses.


Gearing is definitely a big deal in the efficiency of the vehicle. However, my point was that you can not 'work an engine too hard'. Thus, the idea of having too small an engine for fuel efficiency reasons is mute. Obviously there is a point at which it becomes too small to be practical, but that was not the intent of the article.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote