|
Science is supposed to be open, open to ones peers, open to scrutiny, open to opposing views. That is how HONEST science is conducted. The open discussion either strenthens the theory, or kills it. Why is much of climate science conducted behind closed doors with only the conclusions being public? Why is it that only those scientists that agree are allowed to work on the core data.
I have seen calls for those scientists who disagree to have their credentials removed (Dr. Jim Hansen-NASA). Or for Neremberg style trials for crimes against humanity for those scientists who disagreed. (Dr. Heidi Cullen-Weather Channel Climate Scientist)
|