View Single Post
Old 11-29-2012, 06:23 PM   #20 (permalink)
user removed
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
I don't like over square engines. Fine for performance, but not fuel economy. combustion surface area increases buy the bore squared. 100 mm bore has 50% more area than a 80 mm bore.

• Prius:
1,497 cc 1.5 liters in-line 4 front engine with 75.0 mm bore, 84.7 mm stroke, 13.0 compression ratio.

Honda CRX HF: Engine Bore/Stroke 75.0x84.5mm

Saturn S series: 82 Bore× 90 mm stroke

Honda Insight: 72 bore × 81.5 mm stroke

Subaru EJ25

Displacement: 2457 cc
Bore: 99.5 mm
Stroke: 79.0 mm
And the most efficient mega diesels in giant ships have a 3 foot bore and a 9 foot stroke, with a scotch yoke to eliminate piston side loads. Longer stroke means a better lever. Not many short stroke engines are in the top percentages for best BSFC.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote