View Single Post
Old 12-20-2012, 02:21 PM   #553 (permalink)
RustyLugNut
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
So, dissect my post on combustion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Not quite, simplistic propaganda tactic Rusty, you don't like the message, kill the messenger.
I am seeking critical analysis and discussion. If you are capable, do so. If not . . .

Quote:
I also was not aware that other members here were "enemies" (your words, previously posted on this thread).
I quote an ancient Chinese proverb ( supposedly ). I quote another. You find it stings true. Look at your posts, and those of others. It is an antagonistic atmosphere towards anything HHO. I don't mind it. I have been on HHO forums and they are antagonistic towards anything scientific. The problem is when you cannot argue in science. Do so, and the antagonism is welcome.

Quote:
I'm actually glad to see you have a significant understand of combustion turbulence. While that is significant you take the position that others are not nearly as "educated" (kind of arrogant).
My post was not about combustion turbulence as such. And arrogant? Is it not just as arrogant to argue about subjects beyond your understanding?

Quote:
Try sticking to impressing others with facts and evidence that supports your facts.
I am building the scientific case for the possible positive use of HHO as a preamble to the build. The supporting facts and data will come then. The science will be proven or dis-proven, as it may.

Quote:
In your previous responses you are now talking about enhancing combustion efficiency with HHO, not improving mileage with HHO. Just another propaganda tactic.
Look at the end of my post. I talk about the work gain. There should be a measurable gain in mileage that coincides with the measurable increase in the break mean effective pressure (BMEP).


Quote:
Most HHO proponents think their knowledge is superior to those they need to "convert" to their superior understanding.
This is very true. And most opponents use basic science as the argument against HHO, but cannot argue any deeper.

Quote:
Impress me with your knowledge and evidence to support your "assumptions" (do I need to point them out for you?). If you succeed in this endeavor then you will recieve recognition of that success.
Please point them out. I will flesh out my position with the science and mathematics as soon as I figure out how to post the required graphics.

Quote:
If you just want to take simplistic "shots" at people, it will bring, from me at least, an appropriate response. Such "shots" should be beneath your claimed superior knowledge, which without the ability to make your points obvious to others who may lack your supreme educational level, the same knowledge becomes useless, when wrapped in intolerance and arrogance.
People who live in glass houses should not . . .

Oh that's right, you don't like these sayings.

Last edited by RustyLugNut; 12-22-2012 at 08:58 AM.. Reason: Content.
  Reply With Quote