Is the Caliber's aero really that bad? I was able to climb the mountains through Albuquerque in my Jetta @70mph - smallest engine available (110hp versus the Caliber's 14?) - both cars are about the same weight I believe (awd?). Don't know if I could go faster - I just had my cruise control set the whole time. When I had an HPV on my roof - those same climbs were between 55 and 60mph floored (I was also loaded with a summer's worth of gear
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47827/47827731010608b50c8036bde12495ce459c2ff6" alt="Stick Out Tongue"
). I hung out in the semi-truck lane
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85040/85040dfde492703325e8c555ca1ce19b7fcefc07" alt="Big Grin"
Going back down was awesome though
I know that's a comparison between a sedan and hatch - but that makes me even that much more angry at GM
In any case, I personally don't classify a car as a fuel sipper unless it gets >30mpg (my car is on the fence, morso not, without good technique
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47827/47827731010608b50c8036bde12495ce459c2ff6" alt="Stick Out Tongue"
). It's almost as if the mfr's break 100hp just for the sake of breaking 100 :/
Quote:
Okay, so your saying my car shifting into it's highest gear while I glide with the pedal off is actually hurting my fuel economy? If It drops the RPM's from 1600 to 750 at 40mph I'm getting worse than pushing the pedal?
|
Gliding is very different than cruising.... But, and I should have made this more clear (my fault), my comparison was between two different engines. One that can make more power versus one that makes less
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cd42/9cd42323d0cc9f01575a80f4cbe1cfd871d5e876" alt="Smile"