View Single Post
Old 01-17-2013, 07:28 PM   #209 (permalink)
razor02097
Master EcoModder
 
razor02097's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 306

Tetanus - '95 Geo Tracker 4WD Base
90 day: 29.43 mpg (US)

300 - '82 Suzuki GS300 L
Last 3: 60.78 mpg (US)

Jeep - '98 Jeep XJ Cherokee Limited
90 day: 12.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Uh, that's why you have an O2 sensor for every bank, like my car and 10 million Corollas and Celicas out there? (cylinders 1,3 and 2,4 are paired, each have their own O2 sensor)
Please read it again. You are telling me nothing new.

Quote:
Originally Posted by razor02097 View Post
Even a dual exhaust isn't going to solve the issue. The issue is ambient air hitting the O2 will cause the O2 sensor to false lean. With a dual exhaust you will still have sensors on each bank. If you are putting a split manifold on 4 cylinder and only putting an O2 on one pipe the ECU won't be able to monitor the burn cycle on the other cylinders.
You misunderstood my post. I am saying if you were to get rid of a sensor on one of the banks the ECU couldn't monitor that bank.
__________________



Project Avalon: E bike build
  Reply With Quote